|Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement|
|To Scholarlink Resource Center|
|Guidelines for Authors|
|Instructions to Authors|
|Call for papers|
|Guidelines for Reviewers|
|Contacts and Support|
|Support and Contact|
|List of Issues|
Papers published in the journal must meet certain criteria relating to audience, technical content, and presentation.
The review form is designated to help reviewers evaluate manuscripts. If revisions are recommended, reviewers should be as specific as possible in describing changes and should indicate which changes are recommended and which are obligatory. If a paper is rejected because it is outside the scope of the journal, reviewers are requested to recommend that the paper be submitted elsewhere. If a paper is considered un-publishable, reviewers should reject it completely.
The reviewers are requested to look at the manuscript soon after receiving it and return the review as soon as possible (but no later than 3 weeks after receiving the paper). If they cannot meet this term, other reviewers will be sought.
The review should be returned to the editorial office preferably through an email attachment email@example.com
Editor in Chief.
Prof. Gui Yun Tian
Professor of Sensor Technologies
School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering
University of Newcastle
Copyright © Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences 2010